
Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Charter
The mission of the Mobile Web Best Practices
Working Group (BPWG), part of the Mobile Web Initiative Activity, is to
develop a set of technical best practices and associated materials in support
of development of web sites that provide an appropriate user experience on
mobile devices.
End date |
31 December 2010 |
Confidentiality |
Proceedings are publicly accessible |
Initial Chair |
Daniel Appelquist, Vodafone
Jo Rabin, mTLD |
Initial Team Contact
(FTE %: 40) |
François Daoust, W3C/ERCIM Dominique Hazaël-Massieux, W3C/ERCIM |
Usual Meeting Schedule |
Teleconferences: Weekly
Face-to-face: 3-4 per year |
Scope
The main objective of the Best Practices Working
Group (BPWG) is to enable the reach of the Web to be easily extended onto mobile
devices by providing guidelines, checklists and best practice statements
which are easy to comprehend and implement. These, when implemented by a Web
site provider will enable the content to be perceived by users on mobile
devices, particularly small-screen devices such as PDAs, browser-enabled
phones and touch-screen devices.
Following the best practice guidelines will benefit Web site providers
by enabling more users to access their content and services from more types
of devices.
The intent of the Best Practices Working Group is not to force content providers to
limit the scope of their content delivery only those mechanisms which are
available on mobile devices. Rather, the guidelines produced by the Best Practices
Working Group are intended to enable content to be seamlessly perceived
across a range of device form factors. Although mobile browsing user
experience is a function of multiple variables — including a variety of
device-, browser-, network- and content-related factors — the BPWG will be
considering only those directly relevant to its primary focus on content
authoring and adaptation guidelines.
The scope of the Best Practices Working Group consists of the following specific
items:
- Creation of materials to guide authors in creating web sites that
conform to the requirements of a trustmark (working name: "mobileOK")
based on existing standards and taking account of existing best
practices.
Dimensions of analysis associated with best practice include, but are not
limited to
- Valid markup
- content-adaptation guidelines
- User experience issues
- Definition of the meaning of conformance to best practices
- Development of mechanisms by which the level of conformance to best
practices can be assessed.
- Creation of appropriate materials, for site builders and tools vendors,
which may include:
- Authoring guides
- Informative tutorial-type material
- Requirements for a validation tool or tools
- Creation and establishment of the mobileOK trustmark. Issues to be
discussed include the provision of machine readable and human readable
forms of the mark, discoverability of sites that conform, outreach to the
organizations that are consumers of the trustmark.
Success Criteria
- Production of stable documents addressing the work items.
- User community and industry adoption of the group deliverables.
Out of Scope
There is no intent for the Best Practices Working Group to develop new technology,
such as markup languages. However if, during its work, the need for new
technologies is identified, the group may raise requirements with other W3C
groups or groups within other standards organizations.
Deliverables
This section outlines the deliverables the group will produce.
W3C Recommendation-track Deliverables
- W3C Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0: Basic Guidelines
- A W3C Recommendation; currently at Proposed Recommendation
status
- W3C
mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
- A W3C Recommendation; working draft in last call
- mobileOK Basic checker: Reference Implementation and Test Suite
- Mobile Web Application Best Practices
- A W3C recommendation whose principal objective is to enable development and delivery of great Web applications on mobile devices. It will expand and amplify upon general statements made in the Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 recommendation, especially statements that relate to exploitation of device capabilities and awareness of the delivery context. The recommendation may include some best practices that result from the evolution of networks and devices from the time when the Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 recommendation was published.
- W3C mobileOK Pro Tests 1.0
- A W3C Recommendation that will offer a level of the mobileOK
trustmark that implies a higher degree of conformance to the Best
Practices. The name of this second level will be determined by the
working group.
- Labels for mobileOK
- A W3C Recommendation describing how to label content as meeting some
level of mobileOK and to find content so labeled, including vocabulary
specifications as necessary.
- Content Transformation Guidelines
- A W3C Recommendation providing guidance to content transformation proxies and content providers as to how inter-work when delivering Web content.
Supporting Materials
Deliverables may (subject to resources, progress on the core deliverable
and the groups assessment of what is needed) also include
Milestones
Milestones
Note: See changes from this initial schedule on the group
home page. |
Specification |
FPWD |
LC |
CR |
PR |
Rec |
Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
Q3 2008 |
mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 |
|
|
|
Q3 2008 |
Q3 2008 |
mobileOK Scheme |
|
Q3 2008 |
Q4 2008 |
|
Q1 2009 |
mobileOK Basic checker: Reference Implementation
and Test Suite |
Q3 2008 |
mobileOK Labels |
|
Q4 2008 |
|
Q1 2009 |
Q2 2009 |
Mobile Web Application Best Practices |
Q3 2008 |
Q4 2008 |
|
|
Q2 2009 |
mobileOK Pro Tests 1.0 |
Q3 2008 |
|
|
Q2 2009 |
Q2 2009 |
Content Transformation Guidelines |
Q2 2008 |
Q3 2008 |
Q4 2008 |
Q2 2009 |
Q2 2009 |
Future of Best Practices |
Q1 2009 |
Q2 2009 |
The Supporting Materials have
not been included in the preceding set of milestones. If the BPWG
(during its charter) determines that some of those are important,
the milestones listed on the group page will be adjusted to add
them.
Timeline View Summary
- Q2 2008: WD - Content Transformation Guidelines
- Q3 2008: F2F- First face to face meeting under new Charter
- Q3 2008: WD - Mobile Web Application Best Practices
- Q3 2008: WD - mobileOK Pro Tests 1.0
- Q3 2008: LC - mobileOK Scheme
- Q3 2008: LC - Content Transformation Guidelines
- Q3 2008: PR - mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
- Q3 2008: REC- Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0
- Q3 2008: REC- mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
- Q3 2008: ** - mobileOK Checker 1.0 release
- Q4 2008: LC - mobileOK Labels
- Q4 2008: LC - Mobile Web Application Best Practices
- Q4 2008: CR - Content Transformation Guidelines
- Q4 2008: CR - mobileOK Scheme
- Q1 2009: PR - mobileOK Labels
- Q1 2009: REC- mobileOK Scheme
- Q1 2009: ** - First draft, Future of Best Practices work proposal
- Q2 2009: PR - mobileOK Pro Tests 1.0
- Q2 2009: PR - Content Transformation Guidelines
- Q2 2009: REC- Mobile Web Application Best Practices
- Q2 2009: REC- mobileOK Labels
- Q2 2009: REC- mobileOK Pro Tests 1.0
- Q2 2009: REC- Content Transformation Guidelines
- Q2 2009: ** - Final proposal, Future of Best Practices work
Dependencies
- Mobile Web Test
Suites Working Group
- The Best Practices Working Group will have requirements for
tests and will need test results in order to produce some of its
deliverables.
- POWDER Working Group
- Following on from the work of the Web Content Labels incubator group
(WCL-XG), the POWDER working group will produce technology for
identifying resources or groups of resources that are conformant to
specified criteria. This group plans to make use of the output of the
POWDER working group as the underlying technology for the MobileOK
trustmark. We will therefore be closely monitoring this work and
inputting into the discussions. We will make every effort to co-locate
meetings with the POWDER working group during this charter period in
order to facilitate this close liaison.
- Web Accessibility Initiative
- The Best Practices Working Group expects to work directly with the Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Working Group to develop guidelines for
content accessibility on mobile devices. Furthermore, the Best Practices
may review the output of the WCAG Working Group
- Hypertext
Coordination Group
- The Best Practices Working Group will participate in the
Hypertext Coordination Group.
Related
- Mobile Web Initiative Steering Committee
- The Best Practices Working Group exists within the framework of the Mobile Web
Initiative. The Best Practices Working Group chair will sit on the MWI Steering
Committee.
- Open Mobile Alliance: Browsing Technologies Working Group
- The Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Browsing Technologies (BT) working
group drives a number of projects to enhance the applicability and
usability of a browsing applications environment that is tuned to the
mobile device. The group is tasked with taking existing and emerging
web technologies (many from the W3C), and adapting them to the mobile
environment.
The outputs of this sub-group are important and influential within the
mobile community. It is therefore the intention of the Working Group to
develop a strong working relationship with OMA BT by making use of the
W3C-OMA liaison
agreement which defines basic inter-working principles between the
two bodies. This may include email communications between the two
groups, joint conference calls and joint or co-located face-to-face
meetings.
- Mobile Web for Social Development (MW4D)
- The Interest Group will explore how to use the potential of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on Mobile phones as a solution to bridge the Digital Divide and provide minimal services (health, education, governance, business,...) to rural communities and under-privileged populations of Developing Countries.
- Device Descriptions
Working Group (DDWG)
- As the DDWG continues its work on defining an architecture for a
distributed device information repository, we will continue to liaise
with them to ensure that this repository will meet the needs of content
authors wishing to implement the Mobile Web Best Practices. We will
make every effort to co-locate meetings with the Device Descriptions
working group during this charter period in order to facilitate this
close liaison.
- Ubiquitous Web
Applications Working Group
- The Best Practices Working Group expects to review and monitor the work of the
Ubiquitous Web Applications Working Group. The Best Practices Working Group may identify
requirements that are in the scope of the Ubiquitous Web
Applications Working Group.
- Rich Web Clients Activity
- This group will reach out to the W3C Rich Web Clients activity
(specifically the Web APIs and Web Application Formats working groups),
specifically to determine what role AJAX best practices might best play
in the work of the Best Practices Working Group.
- Efficient XML
Interchange (EXI) Working Group
- This group will remain connected to the ongoing efforts in the
Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) working group and will review drafts as
required.
The work of the following Interaction Domain Working Groups may also be
relevant to the Best Practices Working Group:
- Compound Document Formats
- Multimodal Interaction
- Synchronized Multimedia
Furthermore, the Best Practices Working Group expects to follow
these W3C Recommendations:
Participation
Effective participation in the Best Practices Working Group is
expected to consume one work day per week for each participant.
Participants are reminded of the Good
Standing requirements of the W3C Process.
Communication
This group uses the public mailing list public-bpwg@w3.org (archive)
to distribute all documents and for discussions about everything
except logistics and “exceptional” technical discussions
This group uses Member-only, member-bpwg@w3.org (archive)
strictly for discussions about logistics and “exceptional”
technical discussions; all other discussion takes place on the
public list.
Information about the group (deliverables, participants, face-to-face
meetings, teleconferences, etc.) is available from the Best Practices
Working Group home page.
Decision Policy
As explained in the Process Document (section 3.3),
this group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus. When the
Chair puts a question and observes dissent, after due consideration of
different opinions, the Chair should record a decision (possibly after a
formal vote) and any objections, and move on.
Patent Policy
This Working Group operates under the W3C Patent Policy
(5 February 2004 Version). To promote the widest adoption of Web standards,
W3C seeks to issue Recommendations that can be implemented, according to this
policy, on a Royalty-Free basis.
For more information about disclosure obligations for this group, please
see the W3C Patent Policy
Implementation.
About this Charter
This charter for the Best Practices Working Group has been
created according to section 6.2 of the Process Document. In the event of a conflict between this
document or the provisions of any charter and the W3C Process, the W3C
Process shall take precedence.
This charter has been extended:
Please also see the previous charter for this
group.
Copyright ©
2008 W3C ® (MIT , ERCIM
, Keio), All Rights
Reserved.
$Date: 2010/12/13 09:28:40 $