
Product Modelling Incubator Group Charter
The mission of the Product Modelling
Incubator Group, part of the Incubator Activity, is
as follows: The SWOP and S-TEN projects, with the POSC Caesar
Association, believe that it is possible to define a small core
of basic classes and properties for product modelling. This
"product core" could be the basis of the ontologies defined by
the two projects, and for many other application ontologies.
This core could help the development of Web ontologies derived
from existing international standards, such as IFC, STEP and
ISO 15926. Therefore it is proposed to set up a W3C "Product
Modelling" incubator group which will develop this core.
End date |
30 April 2009 |
Confidentiality |
Proceedings are public |
Initial Chairs |
Michel Böhms |
Initiating Members |
|
Usual Meeting Schedule |
Teleconferences:
Monthly
Face-to-face: Once Annually |
Scope
A "product core"
ontology will be created so that statements about a product
can be made using:
- The generic "product core". This will
consist of a few tens of classes and
properties.
- Standard extensions to the "product core"
specific to particular applications. The scope will be
similar to the information models contained within IFC, STEP
and ISO 15926, and to the ontologies being developed within
the SWOP and S-TEN projects. These will consist of a few
hundreds of classes and properties.
- Reference data which may be defined by
engineering data standards such as ISO 15926-4 or by product
suppliers. This will consist of many hundreds of thousands of
classes and properties.
The use of the "product core" will enable
simple operations to be carried out on product data
irrespective of any extension to the core specific to an
application. These operations could include:
- derivations of bills of materials, and
calculations of the material costs;
- calculation of the environmental impact of
a product, such as the CO2
emissions;
- calculation of the mass of a
product,
- generation of
(re)presentations of product aspects.
A possible sequence of work is as
follows:
- The objects of interest, which include
parametric products, variants and actual (local and global)
individuals. Note: There are no agreed formal
definitions for any of these objects at present. Creating
agreed formal definitions will be a task of the incubator
group. Hence the scope of the group is defined merely the
natural language meaning of the terms.
- Whole-part relationships between the objects
of interest, including strict hierarchies and
partitions. Notes: It is a requirement to record
product decomposition in an "open world". It is a requirement
to be able to access decomposition information to determine
all that is part of a product, and to determine the
totality of its environmental impact. Whole-part
relationships is a big area, and raises
questions such as: "Is the hole for a
window a part of a wall?" "Are features parts?"
- Product knowledge in the form of assertion
and derivation rules.
- Configuration management during a design
process. This includes the relationship between end-user
requirements/objectives and their technical solutions,
alternative designs, and subsequent versions of designs,
etc. Note: ISO 10303
(STEP) has developed a terminology for this area.
- Miscellaneous classes and relationships
related to configuration management and design and analysis
work flow, including the roles of people and organisations in
design and analysis activities.
- Physical properties associated with physical
individuals and designs. This topic includes physical
quantities, scales, units of
measure, nominal values, allowed ranges, default values and
uncertainty.
It is not expected that the incubator group
would cover any more than items (1) and (2) in its first
year.
Success Criteria
(Re)usable as generic, common
ontology for many other product modelling initiatives
Out of Scope
Modelling constructs already defined
in base standards such as OWL1.0 and the upcoming OWL
2.0
Process Modelling aspects
Deliverables
Report on the actual PMO- Product Modelling Ontology
defined
Dependencies
W3C Groups
- Semantic Web Activity
- OWL 2.0 to be used as basis
External Groups
There a two EU co-funded projects
which are developing product ontologies for use on the Web,
and derived from, or related to, international standards:
- The European SWOP project
- The SWOP project (see http://www.swop-project.eu/) is
developing end-user product ontologies for product data
based on an upper ontology called PMO for Product
Modelling Ontology. The construction industry sector is
one of the application areas, and these ontologies will
be related to the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) of
the International Association for Interoperability (IAI)
(see http://www.iai-international.org/).
- The European S-TEN project
- The S-TEN project (see http://www.s-ten.eu/) is
developing ontologies for technical and environmental
networks (such as piping or electricity networks and
river basins). These ontologies will be related to the
information models for product data within ISO 10303
(STEP) and for process plants within ISO 15926.
Participation
Monthly telcon's and yearly face-2-face meetings
frequency.
Communication
This group primarily conducts its work on the public
mailing list public-xg-w3pm@w3.org (archive)
. The group's Member-only list is member-xg-w3pm@w3.org
(archive)
Information about the group (deliverables, participants,
face-to-face meetings, teleconferences, etc.) is available
from the Product Modelling
Incubator Group home page.
Decision Policy
As explained in the Process Document (section 3.3), this group will seek to make
decisions when there is consensus. When the Chair puts a
question and observes dissent, after due consideration of
different opinions, the Chair should record a decision
(possibly after a formal vote) and any objections, and move
on.
- When deciding a substantive technical issue, the Chair
may put a question before the group. The Chair must only do
so during a group meeting, and at least two-thirds of
participants in Good Standing must be in attendance. When
the Chair conducts a formal vote to reach a decision on a
substantive technical issue, eligible voters may vote on a
proposal one of three ways: for a proposal, against a
proposal, or abstain. For the proposal to pass there must
be more votes for the proposal than against. In case of a
tie, the Chair will decide the outcome of the
proposal.
- This charter is written in accordance with Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C Process
Document and includes no voting procedures beyond what the
Process Document requires.
Patent Policy
This Incubator Group provides an opportunity to share
perspectives on the topic addressed by this charter. W3C
reminds Incubator Group participants of their obligation to
comply with patent disclosure obligations as set out in
Section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. While
the Incubator Group does not produce Recommendation-track
documents, when Incubator Group participants review
Recommendation-track specifications from Working Groups, the
patent disclosure obligations do apply.
Incubator Groups have as a goal to produce work that can
be implemented on a Royalty Free basis, as defined in the
W3C Patent Policy.
The W3C Team is responsible for notifying all Participants
in this Incubator Group in the event that a new Working Group
is proposed to develop a Recommendation that takes the XG
Report as an input.
For more information about disclosure obligations for this
group, please see the W3C Patent
Policy Implementation.
About this Charter
This charter for the Product Modelling Incubator Group has
been created according to the Incubator Group Procedures documentation. In the
event of a conflict between this document or the provisions of
any charter and the W3C Process, the W3C Process shall take
precedence.
Michel Böhms (TNO in NL). More info
Copyright© 2008 W3C
® (MIT ,
ERCIM
, Keio), All
Rights Reserved.
$Date: 2008/05/05 18:15:26 $